An Examination of the Consequences of Corporate Begging (fine-bara) in Kaduna Central Senatorial Zone, Kaduna State, Nigeria

Pages 107-119
Keywords: Consequences Corporate Begging Fine-bara Insecurity Kaduna Central Senatorial Zone

Abstract

Corporate begging, commonly known as \textit{fine-bara}, is a socio-economic phenomenon that carries significant consequences for individuals and the wider community in the Kaduna Central Senatorial Zone. This study employs a mixed-method approach, utilising quantitative data gathered via questionnaires administered to 537 respondents and qualitative insights obtained through in-depth interviews (IDIs), key informant interviews (KIIs), and case studies. Grounded in Anomie-Strain theory, Differential Association theory, and the Broken Window theory, the study investigates the consequences of corporate begging within the region. Findings reveal that corporate begging produces both positive and negative consequences, with the negative consequences far outweighing the positive ones. Insecurity emerges as the most prominent negative consequence, as corporate beggars have been linked to criminal activities including kidnapping, theft, and sexual harassment. Environmental nuisance, overdependence, poverty, and accidents also constitute notable negative outcomes. On the positive side, respondents acknowledged that corporate begging fulfils religious obligations for givers, potentially reduces criminal tendencies among beggars, and provides intelligence information to security operatives. The study underscores the urgent need for targeted policy interventions to combat corporate begging in the Kaduna Central Senatorial Zone, as no established policies currently exist to address the phenomenon effectively.

How to Cite

Ibrahim, K. (2026). An Examination of the Consequences of Corporate Begging (fine-bara) in Kaduna Central Senatorial Zone, Kaduna State, Nigeria. Niger Delta Journal of Philosophy & African Values, 1(1), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.66286/ndjop.hqjv4gzd

License and Reuse

License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

This article is published under a Creative Commons license. You are free to share this work with proper attribution. For detailed licensing terms and reuse rights, please see our License Terms page.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of our Open Access Policy.

205 views | 144 downloads

Related Articles

Afropolitanism is a philosophical movement propounded and popularised by Taiye Selasi and Achille Mbembe as a response to the identity challenges of Africans in the diaspora. It proposes a new approach to understanding multiple identities and cultures in the globalised world. Afropolitanism challenges the traditional view of citizenship and national identity as linked to borders and a single nation-state. It advocates for a redefinition of citizenship and national identity that accommodates cultural hybridity, transnational connections, and multiple national identities. It transcends the limitations imposed by geographical locations and fosters a sense of belonging that is not restricted to a single nation. Despite its advocacy for multiplicity of cultural affiliation, it retains and recognises the fact that diasporic Africans still maintain ties to their heritage while actively participating in the global economy. This study, therefore, critically examines how Afropolitanism redefines and reinterprets the traditional view of citizenship and national identity, and how it fosters a sense of belonging among Africans in the diaspora that is not linked to legal citizenship. Essentially, Afropolitanism presents a progressive and robust framework for redefining citizenship in an increasingly interconnected world.

This study critically examines the enduring impact of British colonial rule on Nigeria's political, economic, and socio-cultural development since independence in 1960. Using historical and documentary analytical approaches, the study explores how colonial administrative structures, economic policies, and social institutions established during the colonial period created patterns that persist in contemporary governance and development challenges. The colonial state introduced centralised political institutions, indirect rule, and artificial territorial boundaries that contributed to persistent ethnic tensions, political instability, and governance inefficiencies in post-colonial Nigeria. Economically, colonial policies oriented Nigeria's economy towards the export of primary commodities and dependence on external markets, thereby limiting industrial diversification and sustainable economic growth. Furthermore, the colonial education system and socio-cultural transformations produced elite structures and developmental inequalities that continue to influence social mobility and regional disparities. By situating Nigeria's present developmental challenges within the historical context of colonial rule, this paper argues that many structural constraints to national development are rooted in colonial legacies that were insufficiently reformed after independence. The article concludes that understanding these historical continuities is essential for formulating policies aimed at sustainable development, institutional reform, and national integration in contemporary Nigeria.

Skip to main content