Editorial Policies

Peer Review Process

All submissions undergo a double-blind peer review process:

  1. Initial editorial screening for scope and quality
  2. Assignment to at least two expert reviewers
  3. Review period of 4-6 weeks
  4. Editorial decision based on reviewer recommendations

Ethics Policy

1. Core Principles

We uphold:

  • Integrity: Commitment to truth, accuracy, and intellectual honesty.
  • Ubuntu: Decisions guided by communal responsibility, fairness, and respect.
  • Transparency: Clear processes for handling submissions, corrections, and disputes.
  • Accountability: Authors, reviewers, and editors share responsibility for ethical standards.

2. Author Responsibilities

  • Originality: Submissions must be unpublished and free of plagiarism.
  • Authorship: Include only those who made significant contributions; obtain consent from all co-authors.
  • Conflicts of Interest: Disclose financial, institutional, or personal relationships that may influence work.
  • Data & Sources: Provide accurate citations; preserve raw data for verification.
  • Generative AI: Declare AI use in methodology/analysis; AI cannot be listed as an author.

3. Reviewer Responsibilities

  • Impartiality: Evaluate manuscripts objectively, without bias.
  • Confidentiality: Treat submissions as private documents; do not share or misuse content.
  • Timeliness: Promptly decline or complete reviews.
  • Competence: Only review papers within your expertise.

4. Editorial Responsibilities

  • Fairness: Ensure equitable treatment of all submissions.
  • Confidentiality: Protect identities of authors/reviewers.
  • Vigilance: Screen for plagiarism, dual submission, and ethical violations.
  • Corrective Actions: Issue corrections, retractions, or expressions of concern when errors/misconduct occur.

5. Handling Ethical Violations

Allegations (e.g., plagiarism, falsification, authorship disputes) will be investigated:

  • Initial Assessment: Determine validity using COPE guidelines.
  • Investigation: Contact involved parties; request evidence.
  • Resolution: Take action proportionate to severity:
    • Correction for minor errors.
    • Retraction for severe misconduct.
    • Reporting to institutions/funders if needed.
  • Appeals: Authors may contest decisions with new evidence.

6. Special Considerations

  • Cultural Sensitivity: Respect indigenous knowledge and African philosophical traditions.
  • Patient/Community Consent: Required for studies involving human subjects or local communities.
  • Research Data: Encourage open data sharing where ethically feasible.

7. Resources & Support

  • Follow COPE Guidelines for complex cases.
  • Use NDJOP's templates for corrections, retractions, and dispute resolution.
  • Contact [email protected] for ethics queries.

8. Policy Enforcement

  • Violations may result in rejection, retraction, or 3-year submission bans.
  • Repeat offenders reported to their institutions.

Review Frequency: Annually, or as ethics standards evolve.
Alignment: COPE Core Practices • Ubuntu Philosophy • African Values Framework

Adopted: August 5th, 2025
© Niger Delta Journal of Philosophy & African Values. All rights reserved.

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Gold Open Access Model

  • Article Processing Charges (APCs): ₦30,000 (Nigerian authors) / $100 (Foreign authors)
  • No subscription fees for readers
  • Immediate access to all published content
  • Published under Creative Commons licenses

For comprehensive details about our open access model, APC fees, licensing terms, author rights, and long-term preservation policies, please visit our dedicated Open Access Policy page and License Terms page.

Digital Preservation and Archiving

NDJOP is committed to ensuring the permanent preservation and long-term accessibility of all published research. Our preservation strategy includes:

Persistent Identifiers

All articles receive DOIs through Crossref, ensuring permanent citability and discoverability.

Archival Networks

Content preserved through institutional repositories and national archives.

Archival Quality

Articles stored in PDF/A format with complete metadata for long-term readability.

Perpetual Access

Content remains accessible even if the journal ceases publication.

For detailed information about our preservation strategies and archival commitments, see our Open Access Policy page and Copyright Terms page.

Skip to main content