Application of John Locke’s Social Contract Theory to Democratic Governance in Nigeria

Pages 28-51
Keywords: Locke social contract theory democratic governance Nigeria consent of the gov- erned constitutionalism African political philosophy Ubuntu

Abstract

The paper explores John Locke's social contract theory, engaging with philosophy to analyse his political theory and Nigeria's democratic governance within Nigeria’s social contract. Drawing on Locke's Two Treatises of Government (1689), A Letter Concerning Toleration (1689), and An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689), the research highlights natural rights, consent of the governed, constitutionalism, the right of government, limited government, and the right of revolution in the context of Nigeria’s polity. The research adopts a qualitative philosophical methodology based on conceptual, textual, and critical analyses of primary and secondary texts, including Locke. The paper submits that Nigeria’s constitutional democracy is Lockean in that it provides for fundamental rights, institutions of representative democracy, and separation of powers. However, democracy in Nigeria has largely reversed these theoretical democratic principles. Electoral misconduct, institutional corruption, elite domination, weak and ineffective accountability frameworks, and inadequate civic engagement have been significant impediments to the social contract between the Nigerian state and citizens. In addition, the paper submits that this is, to a great extent, a philosophical problem of applying Lockean liberalism in post-colonial African states, as it attempts to argue for the absoluteness of Western democracy on the African continent. This gap is addressed in the research by African political philosophy, in particular Ubuntu ethics, consensus democracy, and African progressive systems of governance, among others, as presented by philosophers like Kwasi Wiredu, Mogobe Ramose, and Kwame Gyekye. The paper submits that, for Nigeria, the critical thinking of democracy and Lockean liberalism cannot be the only and all sides to the conundrum, but African notions of democracy and citizenship must be taken on board as well. This study argues that Locke’s social contract theory is still relevant to the practice of democratic governance in Nigeria. This is because it provides a framework within which one can assess the validity of democracy, responsiveness, and the rule of law within a democracy. That said, one must critically tailor the theory to the history, culture, and post-colonial situations of Nigeria.

How to Cite

Arepamo, A. G. & Udisi, E. S. (2026). Application of John Locke’s Social Contract Theory to Democratic Governance in Nigeria. Niger Delta Journal of Philosophy & African Values, 1(2), 28-51. https://doi.org/10.66286/ndjop.10m8thd1

License and Reuse

License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

This article is published under a Creative Commons license. You are free to share this work with proper attribution. For detailed licensing terms and reuse rights, please see our License Terms page.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of our Open Access Policy.

10 views | 3 downloads

Related Articles

African feminist epistemology emerges as a decolonial response to the historical marginalisation of women's knowledge on the continent. Colonial legacies and Western epistemological traditions, centred on the autonomous, abstract subject, have systematically erased indigenous knowledge systems and imposed individualistic frameworks that distort African women's relational ontologies. Through philosophical hermeneutics and conceptual analysis of African feminist and decolonial scholarship, the paper investigates how relational knowing can be reclaimed as a decolonial epistemological alternative. This article argues that knowledge in African contexts is fundamentally situated, relational, and ethically accountable. It is produced through communal ethics, dialogical identities, and lived experiences rather than detached certainty or universal reason. African feminist epistemology resists essentialism and standpoint homogenisation while reclaiming marginalised voices through plurality, testimonial justice, and the integration of indigenous practices such as griot storytelling and oral traditions. The article contributes to African epistemology and demonstrates that relational knowing empowers African women and advances a more inclusive, decolonised model of knowledge production that integrates diverse perspectives, ethical responsibility, and collaborative inquiry into broader epistemological discourse.

Skip to main content